Could the payment provisions of the construction act displace capped payment sums set out in letters of intent? (First published in the Construction Law Review 2016)

There has been much written about (and cautioned against) the use of letters of intent over the years. It is perhaps a testament to the attention letters of intent have been given that the courts have seen very few cases recently where the parties are governed, or said to be governed, by them.

Continue reading

Case report: Carillion Construction Ltd v Woods Bagot Europe Ltd and others [2016] EWHC 905 (TCC)

Background Carillion Construction Limited (Carillion), a contractor, entered into a JCT standard form building contract with contractor’s design with Rolls Development UK Ltd (Rolls) in June 2007, for the construction of the High Court’s Rolls Building in London.  The building contract contained typical provisions for the extension of time and liquidated damages in the event…

Continue reading